With a beer in one tentacle and a book in another, Paper Darts is taking back the lit scene, one lame pen and quill metaphor at a time.

We are primarily a magazine, but we are also a publishing press, a creative agency, a community, and an idea.

Search

Writing

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.

www.regansmith.co


Friday
Feb172012

Do you bleed red ink?

Illustrations by Max Mose

If you’re reading this, someone once taught you an invaluable thing: how to read. Shortly thereafter, you were likely taught how to write, and then write properly—how to use correct tenses, where to place prepositions, etc. 

Some learned to be very good at following these directions. They went on to bleed red ink all over their peers’ papers. They approached storeowners and informed them that their signs should read “5 items or fewer.”

I used to be one of those people. I thought that my propensity for proper usage made me inherently intelligent and literary. It’s easy to make the same association I did—grammarphiles find themselves in fanatical company. There exists a Society for the Preservation of English Language and Literature (SPELL) whose sole purpose is to point out grammatical errors. Many books have been published under the premise that if you misuse grammar, there could be deadly consequences.1

All right, so there are rules, and these people are only trying to enforce them. But to what end? It is one thing to pride yourself on your perfect prose, but why does everyone else need to strive for grammatical perfection? It’s at best disingenuous and annoying, and at worst self-serving and elitist.

Constantly correcting the improper grammar of others isn’t just exasperatingly dull.

  • It fosters a state of language where people are afraid to make mistakes and are consequently afraid to express themselves.
  • It puts the focus on the medium of communication, rather that what is being communicated.
  • It shifts the purpose of language from being a means of communication and vast expression to being foremost an indicator of education and/or class.      

Nine times out of ten, when someone corrects another’s improper grammar, it isn’t because there is a misunderstanding about what is being said. The latent motive is to say “I’m smarter than you” or “I’m more educated than you” or “I’m of a higher social strata.” It’s hardly about “saving the language.” As long as editors exist, someone will be propagating old usage. Meanwhile, the rest of us will be inventing new usage; turning nouns into verbs; misusing idiomatic expressions, and creating the sometimes rich, sometimes simplified, always democratized parlance of tomorrow. 

Lingual heresy? Far from it. It is a drastic misunderstanding of language to safeguard its rules. Language thrives on new interpretations and misunderstandings. Ask the poor saps at the Oxford English Dictionary trying to keep up with it. If you don’t like an addition to your language, don’t use it. No one will force you to, and likewise, you shouldn’t force your ideal language on others.

I’m not saying to hell with grammar. I only mean to disavow the grammar-first culture that believes others’ trifling errors warrant confrontation. Yes, if you take a snapshot of a language, it is a static thing with set rules. And when precise communication is called for, grammar and proper usage will always have their place. But if someone asks me how I’m doing, our conversation has no need of exactitude. “Good” is just as acceptable as “well.”


1 Eats, Shoots & Leaves, anyone? From the Amazon.com description: “Eats, Shoots and Leaves adopts a more militant approach and attempts to recruit an army of punctuation vigilantes: send letters back with the punctuation corrected. Do not accept sloppy emails. Climb ladders at dead of night with a pot of paint to remove the redundant apostrophe in ‘Video’s sold here’.” Gag me.

« Soft News: I have a literary crush | Main | Genres: useful and destructive »

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    NFL is definitely one of the largest sports in America. It has a big following.
  • Response
    Response: Hollister
    Paper Darts: ART LIT - Blog - Do you bleed red ink?,Denne artikkelen ble skrevet den nøyaktige Men hvis du ønsker å se relaterte artikler du kan se informasjonen her:Hollister,
  • Response
    Response: spelo
    Paper Darts: ART + LIT - Blog - Do you bleed red ink?
  • Response
    Paper Darts: ART + LIT - Blog - Do you bleed red ink?

Reader Comments (1)

Great post. This reminds me of @stealthmountain, who created a Twitter-bot to correct Tweets anytime someone used the phrase "sneak peak" when they meant "sneak peek." He also collects some of the most hostile responses he receives.

Some day I'm going to construct a post about a sneaky mountain peak and shame him with his correction.

February 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterChris Jones

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>